Pro Second Amendment Argument For Bearing Any Arm

 by Barry Ferguson
7/15/21

Those who would like to disarm America argue against the second amendment and use the same assertion their cult tells them to use. That is, the amendment was not intended to allow citizens to own weapons of war. We are not supposed to have powerful weapons. The anti-2A people say we little people were never supposed to have AR-15s or ‘assault rifles’ or nuclear bombs. The government should confiscate such weaponry and greatly restrict ownership rights.

As usual, as a proponent of individual liberty, I disagree.   

Reading the document and applying perspective might lead one to an interpretation overlooked by debaters on both sides of the 2A. It may be that the genius of James Madison implied that we should all be secure in whatever weaponry we choose to own.

One could make the argument, therefore, that we citizens have the right to any weaponry we choose from a pistol to a nuclear warhead.

So what exactly did James Madison have in mind when he penned the second amendment to the US Constitution?

The Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The ‘well regulated militia’ consists of ‘we the people’. We, the people, should therefore be a military deterrent to the government’s military in order to ensure a ‘free state’. How can we be a deterrent if we don’t have equal weaponry? Let’s apply the democrat term, ‘equity’.  

‘Necessary to the security of a free state’ means our freedom is dependent upon our ability to defend ourselves with lethal force against any foreign government intrusion and that includes US government intrusion. The amendment’s writer, James Madison, believed citizens had the right to defend themselves against a tyrannical US government. God bless James Madison! If we have learned anything from the last 75 years of US dominance over the world, it is the US never invades another country or person that has equivalent weaponry. Madison was a genius.

‘The right of the people to keep and bear arms’ is the crux of the 2A argument.

What is meant by ‘keep and bear arms’?

‘Keep’ is to own and ‘bear’ means or implies to display in a forceful posture. This let’s our enemies know we are locked and loaded.

‘Arms’ of Madison’s day were single shot musket rifles or swords or big sticks. Citizens and soldiers both used the same exact weapons. The intention of the second amendment, so it seems, is to give citizens the right to own the same weapons as the military. Again, to quote the democrats, this is ‘equity’.  

The most advanced military weapons of the day were perhaps canons or mortars. Members of the military carried single shot musket rifles or swords. The second amendment does not differentiate types of weaponry citizens were allowed to possess. The degree of weaponry we the people ‘keep and bear’ is commensurate with the enemy’s degree of weaponry of which we are threatened.

Isn’t it interesting that Madison articulated the right of free people to have equivalent weaponry for their militias so they could adequately defend themselves against any tyrannical government seeking domination over them? Look what has happened to the countries of Canada and Australia after they allowed their weapons to be seized. These countries are now nothing more than perpetual penal colonies as their citizens are pathetic subjects to their rulers. Citizens are kept in pens because their governments keep them locked down and terrified of the bioweapon Covid. Did I mention that Madison was a genius? If we ignore Madison, we Americans will find ourselves wearing the shackles of slavery that will probably be made in Canada or Australia since they have become experts in the Massah’s domination. Tyrannical countries are incapable of producing a James Madison or anything else worthwhile to the human species.

No one in the late 1700’s could fathom an automatic weapon much less a missile, a bomb, or a nuclear warhead. These weapons were yet to be invented. Nevertheless, it seems that the second amendment’s real purpose was to put the average citizen on equivalent footing with the average military member in terms of weapons. The second amendment is like the Queen to a chess player. If one player can capture the opponents Queen, that player now has a huge advantage and can dominate the chess board with power. Every tyrant plays the same strategy. Capture the guns. Then exert domination.  

Warfare has always evolved with the evolution of weapons. What if Madison had lived in the early 1900’s and the Constitution was written then. Automatic weapons were becoming commonplace. Airplanes were beginning to drop bombs. Biologic and chemical weapons were being produced. Would Madison have used the same language?

What if Roger Stone had mounted a 50-caliber machine gun on his roof and parked an Apache attack helicopter in his back yard? I’ll bet that FBI raid of Mr. Stone’s residence featuring 17 agents in full military gear with CNN in tow would have gone down differently.

So, with perspective, it seems that indeed the second amendment gives each of us the right to own automatic weapons, rockets, tanks, F-16s, or even nuclear bombs. Perhaps now we should equip ourselves with biologic weapons like the US uses on us in case a swarm of government gestapo agents descend upon our home?  

Lastly, we might should all revisit the meaning of ‘infringed’, as in ‘the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed’!

Of course there is another argument as a condition in which none of us would need to own such weapons. That would be if were permitted to live in peace and liberty and were not constantly threatened by government tyranny.

How do we know when we are experiencing government tyranny?

Thomas Jefferson defined it well when he said the following: “When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”   

 



Copyright BMF Investments, Inc. 2021

The BWC Covid-19 Crime Scene

by Barry Ferguson
7/2/21

The Fauci-Covid virus exposed a lot of truths and a lot of crimes.

It is a crime against humanity to weaponize viruses. Most importantly, a crime against humanity is outlined in the Biological Weapons Convention treaty of 1972. The BWC makes it clear that its sole purpose was to forbid any work with bioweapons such as viruses. The BWC states in part that no researcher nor any nation should ever endeavor to develop biological weapons.

Specifically, the law states: “never in any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or retain: microbial or other biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes; weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.”

Clearly, any such behavior falling under the BWC treaty is a crime. A link to the document is here. Get it before it is censored: https://www.un.org/disarmament/biological-weapons

Covid appears to be a biological weapon. So too does the supposed ‘vaccine’.

If this treaty were to be enforced, there would be too many criminals to list. Start with Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates, the WHO, the FDA, the CDC, and on and on.

The Covid crime scene is expansive. Many employers decided to pay more to induce employees to continuing working given we were all told we were going to die if another person breathed on us. Bank of America recently said they would start employees at $25/hr. Many retailers joined the wage increase party. Shazamm!! We now have the worst inflation in years. Housing has gone up, up, and away. Rent just experienced the largest jump ever! Gas prices are up double digits, Taxes are rising. Restaurants are raising prices.

Let it be recorded so dumbasses who call themselves ‘economists’ or ‘politicians’ or even the dumbasses that have been protesting demanding ‘$15 p/hr’ pay, never forget again that most of the wage increases were consumed by corresponding inflation. Well, duh! Can this absolute correlation be added to text books? Yes, somewhere between ‘all white people are bad’ and ‘transgenders are virtuous’, text books should mention that forced higher wages stimulate inflation. Poor people stay poor and rich people stay rich. Higher production produces higher wages. Ignorance of this correlation should be a crime. 

Another crime of Covid has been that we now know political and ‘health’ leaders are trying to murder us. The ‘white coat’ doctors put out a video on the sham-crisis plandemic of Covid. Dr. Simone Gold made a very interesting point that most people missed. She said that hydroxychloroquine was banned so a big pharma ‘vaccine’ could be ‘fast tracked’ by the FDA. By law, no potential medication can be fast tracked if there is currently a viable alternative to treat a particular ailment or disease. Read that last sentence over and over. This is why the medical community won’t even recommend chicken soup and rest for Covid. By not making recommendations to alleviate symptoms, the medical community is committing crimes against humanity by refusing to treat illness with all available means. 

All members of media are complicit in the Covid crime as they censored any information, including the White Coat Doctors, that was counter to the economic lockdowns and the alleged efficacy of a vaccine. They should all be charged with crimes against humanity for suppression of vital information and giving medical advice without a license. Line up Facebook, Google, all the networks, and so on.

Sadly, another crime of Covid has been the corruption of science. Science defined from dictionary.com: a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws:

Dr. Panagis Galiatsatos, a pulmonologist who serves as national spokesperson for the American Lung Association was quoted as saying that smokers of tobacco and cannabis products would have worse outcomes from a covid infection. Actually, real scientists all over the globe found early on that tobacco smokers in particular were very underrepresented in covid patients. This is a doctor that is not a scientist and should not be trusted to treat a goldfish. He works for the deep state. Not us.

British American Tobacco developed a vaccine from nicotine to treat Covid. The world health authorities shut them down from delivering this medication. Why? Because the point here is not about health but rather control of the human species. 

Dr. Mike Yeadon, is a former Vice-President and Chief Science Officer at Pfizer, who held this position for  16 years. He and his co-authors, all well-known scientists, published a scientific paper in September of 2020 and he wrote a corresponding magazine article on September 20, 2020. Among other things, he and they state – and I quote: “We’re basing our government policy, our economic policy, and the policy of restricting fundamental rights, presumably on completely wrong data and assumptions about the coronavirus.” In other words, our government leaders are committing fraud every day. Yeah, I know readers are shocked to read that!

Lastly, Covid revealed that the information channel is censored so that we are given a narrative rather than a fact. For instance, we hear about the Covid kill shot killing and maiming scores of shot recipients. Most people don’t know that this information comes from the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). This is a system that depends completely on people volunteering their information. Thus, many deaths and injuries are not reported and we are fed more garbage data. And, the government is censoring the system. None of us really know how much damage the experimental shots have done. Keeping data and information from us is a criminal act.

So, it seems to me that we are short on one thing - prisons.



Copyright BMF Investments, Inc. 2021